Calling delete on variable allocated on the stack(在堆栈上分配的变量上调用 delete)
问题描述
忽略编程风格和设计,对分配在堆栈上的变量调用 delete 是否安全"?
Ignoring programming style and design, is it "safe" to call delete on a variable allocated on the stack?
例如:
int nAmount;
delete &nAmount;
或
class sample
{
public:
sample();
~sample() { delete &nAmount;}
int nAmount;
}
推荐答案
否,在堆栈分配的变量上调用 delete 是不安全的.你应该只对 new 创建的东西调用 delete.
No, it is not safe to call delete on a stack-allocated variable. You should only call delete on things created by new.
- 对于每个
malloc或calloc,应该只有一个free. - 对于每个
new,应该恰好有一个delete. - 对于每个
new[],应该恰好有一个delete[]. - 对于每个堆栈分配,不应有明确的释放或删除.在适用的情况下,会自动调用析构函数.
- For each
mallocorcalloc, there should be exactly onefree. - For each
newthere should be exactly onedelete. - For each
new[]there should be exactly onedelete[]. - For each stack allocation, there should be no explicit freeing or deletion. The destructor is called automatically, where applicable.
一般情况下,您不能混合搭配其中任何一种,例如没有 free-ing 或 delete[]-ing new 对象.这样做会导致未定义的行为.
In general, you cannot mix and match any of these, e.g. no free-ing or delete[]-ing a new object. Doing so results in undefined behavior.
这篇关于在堆栈上分配的变量上调用 delete的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:在堆栈上分配的变量上调用 delete
- 使用 __stdcall & 调用 DLLVS2013 中的 GetProcAddress() 2021-01-01
- GDB 不显示函数名 2022-01-01
- OpenGL 对象的 RAII 包装器 2021-01-01
- 哪个更快:if (bool) 或 if(int)? 2022-01-01
- 将 hdc 内容复制到位图 2022-09-04
- XML Schema 到 C++ 类 2022-01-01
- DoEvents 等效于 C++? 2021-01-01
- 将函数的返回值分配给引用 C++? 2022-01-01
- 如何提取 __VA_ARGS__? 2022-01-01
- 从父 CMakeLists.txt 覆盖 CMake 中的默认选项(...)值 2021-01-01
