我可以在向量中使用 const 来允许添加元素，但不能修改已添加的元素吗?-C/C++问题

Can I use const in vectors to allow adding elements, but not modifications to the already added?(我可以在向量中使用 const 来允许添加元素，但不能修改已添加的元素吗?)

本文介绍了我可以在向量中使用 const 来允许添加元素，但不能修改已添加的元素吗?的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！

问题描述

我对 this answer 的评论让我开始思考这些问题常量和排序.我玩了一下，将我的问题减少到以下代码:

My comments on this answer got me thinking about the issues of constness and sorting. I played around a bit and reduced my issues to the fact that this code:

#include <vector>

int main() {
    std::vector <const int> v;  
}

不会编译 - 你不能创建一个 const int 的向量.显然，我应该知道这一点(并且在智力上我做到了)，但我以前从来不需要创造这样的东西.但是，它对我来说似乎是一个有用的构造，我想知道是否有任何方法可以解决这个问题 - 我想将东西添加到向量(或其他)，但一旦添加就不应更改它们.

will not compile - you can't create a vector of const ints. Obviously, I should have known this (and intellectually I did), but I've never needed to create such a thing before. However, it seems like a useful construct to me, and I wonder if there is any way round this problem - I want to add things to a vector (or whatever), but they should not be changed once added.

可能有一些令人尴尬的简单解决方案，但这是我以前从未考虑过的.我可能不应该提到排序(我可能会问另一个问题，请参阅 this 用于提出问题的困难).我真正的基本用例是这样的:

There's probably some embarrassingly simple solution to this, but it's something I'd never considered before. I probably should not have mentioned sorting (I may ask another question about that, see this for the difficulties of asking questions). My real base use case is something like this:

vector <const int> v; // ok (i.e. I want it to be OK) v.push_back( 42 ); // ok int n = v[0]; // ok v[0] = 1; // not allowed

推荐答案

嗯，在 C++0x 中你可以...

Well, in C++0x you can...

在 C++03 中有一段 23.1[lib.containers.requirements]/3，它说

In C++03, there is a paragraph 23.1[lib.containers.requirements]/3, which says

这些组件中存储的对象类型必须满足CopyConstructible类型(20.1.3)的要求，以及Assignable类型的附加要求.

The type of objects stored in these components must meet the requirements of CopyConstructible types (20.1.3), and the additional requirements of Assignable types.

这是目前阻止您使用 const int 作为 std::vector 的类型参数的原因.

This is what's currently preventing you from using const int as a type argument to std::vector.

但是，在 C++0x 中，缺少这一段，而是要求 T 为 Destructible 和对 T 的附加要求是按表达式指定的，例如std::vector 上的 v = u 仅在 T 为 MoveConstructible 和 MoveAssignable.

However, in C++0x, this paragraph is missing, instead, T is required to be Destructible and additional requirements on T are specified per-expression, e.g. v = u on std::vector is only valid if T is MoveConstructible and MoveAssignable.

如果我正确解释这些要求，应该可以实例化 std::vector<const int>，你只会丢失它的一些功能(我猜这正是你想要的).您可以通过将一对迭代器传递给构造函数来填充它.我认为 emplace_back() 也应该可以工作，尽管我没有找到对 T 的明确要求.

If I interpret those requirements correctly, it should be possible to instantiate std::vector<const int>, you'll just be missing some of its functionality (which I guess is what you wanted). You can fill it by passing a pair of iterators to the constructor. I think emplace_back() should work as well, though I failed to find explicit requirements on T for it.

您仍然无法就地对向量进行排序.

You still won't be able to sort the vector in-place though.

这篇关于我可以在向量中使用 const 来允许添加元素，但不能修改已添加的元素吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持编程学习网！